Search for: All records

Any graph drawing can be characterised by a range of computational aesthetic metrics. For example, a given drawing might be described as having eight crossings, a mean angular resolution of 0.34, and an edge orthogonality value of 0.72. However, without knowing the distribution of these metrics it is hard to compare the quality of drawings of different graphs, nor know whether a given drawing is typical or an outlier within the space of all possible drawings. This paper explores the range and distribution of ten normalised graph drawing layout metrics, based on graphs created by six graph generation algorithms and drawings created by six popular layout algorithms. We include the “Rome" and “North" graph repositories in our analysis. Our exploration of the multi-dimensional aesthetics space allows for comparisons between the graph drawing algorithms, highlighting those that cover larger or smaller volumes of the aesthetics space. We calculate the correlation coefficients between the metrics, indicating those that may conflict with each other (negatively correlated), and those that may be redundant (positively correlated). Our results will be useful as the basis for simulated annealing or gradient descent layout algorithms, for identifying the best layout algorithms for producing a specified combination and range of aesthetics, and for informing experimental controls in human empirical studies. 

We describe a system designed to process, analyze and visualize academic data, from research papers and research proposals to list of courses taught, consulting, internal and external service. This can be helpful in identifying experts in a given field for future collaborations, as well as in putting together strong multi-disciplinary teams to apply for future research funding. Our REMatch system aims to support such tasks by leveraging natural language processing, machine learning, and interactive visualization. Specifically, REMatch provides a functional system that implements in-the-browser, map-based interactive navigation of a large underlying network, supporting semantic zooming, panning, searching, and map overlays. A prototype of the system is evaluated with a small-scale case study. 

The Global Research Activity Map (GRAM) is an interactive web-based system for visualizing and analyzing worldwide scholarship activity as represented by research topics. The underlying data for GRAM is obtained from Google Scholar academic research profiles and is used to create a weighted topic graph. Nodes correspond to self-reported research topics and edges indicate co-occurring topics in the profiles. The GRAM system supports map-based interactive features, including semantic zooming, panning, and searching. Map overlays can be used to compare human resource investment, displayed as the relative number of active researchers in particular topic areas, as well scholarly output in terms of citations and normalized citation counts. Evaluation of the GRAM system, with the help of university research management stakeholders, reveals interesting patterns in research investment and output for universities across the world (USA, Europe, Asia) and for different types of universities. While some of these patterns are expected, others are surprising. Overall, GRAM can be a useful tool to visualize human resource investment and research productivity in comparison to peers at a local, regional and global scale. Such information is needed by university administrators to identify institutional strengths and weaknesses and to make strategic data-driven decisions.